Internet, Paid Blogging

Google targeting PayPerPost blogs

Blogs that write get paid to reviews for PayPerPost are being targeted by Google according to the PayPerPost blog post titled Google Goes After The Everyday Blogger. Bloggers saw their PageRank reduced to 0 from whatever they had previously.

We now know from some of our friends inside of Google (thanks “bob”) that they are now looking for phrases such as PPP, PayPerPost, ReviewMe, Payu2blog, etc. in the text of your post. For that reason I would suggest refraining from using any type of this text in the body of your posts, sponsored or not. When you disclose thank the sponsor, not PPP.

A PayPerPost employee who doesn’t write paid reviews had his blog deranked because he simply talked about his day to day work.

PayPerPost parent company IZEA has come up with its own ranking system RealRank which they say gives a more accurate way of ranking blogs. Using a piece of javascript, RealRank data is gathered from the IZEA Toolkit “ITK” (formerly PPP Tools). It uses this formula:

70% weighted towards visitors per day
20% weighted towards amount of ACTIVE inbound links per day
10% weighted towards pageviews per day

ITK gathers REAL traffic information, much like your analytics platform and ranks users based on their standing within the network. It will be implemented within the next few weeks.

While this solves the problem of unfair PageRank, it remains to be seen if how to make money fast bloggers are ready and willing to give up PageRank which still affects their other sources of income. Unless a blogger derives the bulk of his income from PayPerPost, setting up an alternative ranking system for members doesn’t serve any real purpose outside the realm of PayPerPost.

9 Comments

speak up

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site.

Subscribe to these comments.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*Required Fields